Hmmmm, they support IRAQIS, but not one word about Saddam himself. I find it interesting that the points they want to bring up in this “resolution” of theirs really don’t say much…it’s all stuff that they can SAY, but not have to ACT on. In other words, they can throw a hissy, but not committ any of their own troops or resources.
Which is all to the better….we don’t need this war getting any bigger, or more out of hand, than it’s already committed to being.
Hmmmm, they support IRAQIS, but not one word about Saddam himself. I find it interesting that the points they want to bring up in this “resolution” of theirs really don’t say much…it’s all stuff that they can SAY, but not have to ACT on. In other words, they can throw a hissy, but not committ any of their own troops or resources.
Which is all to the better….we don’t need this war getting any bigger, or more out of hand, than it’s already committed to being.