04 Aug 2004 @ 8:16 PM 

Esquire has an article by the ever-eloquent Ron Reagan discussing his perceived failings in the Bush administration. The “lying for lying’s sake” argument is a good one. What was gained by pretending that Gore spent more in 2000 than Bush, when anyone with a bit of research can find out the opposite was true? There are other examples.

Posted By: Gary
Last Edit: 04 Aug 2004 @ 08:17 PM

EmailPermalink
Tags
Categories: Political


 

Responses to this post » (None)

 

Sorry, but comments are closed. Check out another post and speak up!


 Last 50 Posts
Change Theme...
  • Users » 2
  • Posts/Pages » 8,681
  • Comments » 899
Change Theme...
  • VoidVoid « Default
  • LifeLife
  • EarthEarth
  • WindWind
  • WaterWater
  • FireFire
  • LightLight

MythTV



    No Child Pages.

Who is Bunk?



    No Child Pages.

Friends



    No Child Pages.