23 Feb 2010 @ 1:50 PM 

After many years of being mocked by anyone with a modicum of understanding in medicine or science or reproducible results, homeopathy has been slammed by an actual governmental study in the UK.  I particularly like the line refuting the necessity to fund “traditional” medicine: “Witchcraft is traditional, so does that mean the MHRA should endorse that too?”

Posted By: Gary
Last Edit: 23 Feb 2010 @ 01:51 PM



Responses to this post » (2 Total)

  1. Rosanne says:

    Just like an “all-natural” diet could include a tisane of hemlock and oleander.

    Hey, my favorite placebo is chocolate cake. I feel better with every bite. Think I could get that funded?

  2. Gary says:

    I’m pretty sure naturopaths can be covered by the same rationale, sure.

Post a Comment

XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>

 Last 50 Posts
Change Theme...
  • Users » 2
  • Posts/Pages » 4,910
  • Comments » 896
Change Theme...
  • VoidVoid « Default
  • LifeLife
  • EarthEarth
  • WindWind
  • WaterWater
  • FireFire
  • LightLight


    No Child Pages.

Who is Bunk?

    No Child Pages.


    No Child Pages.