09 Sep 2004 @ 7:43 PM 

This analysis of CBS’s documents seems pretty thorough and convincing. The superscript and completely different signatures are interesting. Not to mention, the document used as a “proof” of forgery was done with Word’s default settings: 1.5 inch margins. Normal margins are 1 inch per side; even assuming the document was created on the old mil-standard paper, that leaves a half-inch anomaly for any clerk worth his salt in 1973. Wonder if the people who created these apparent forgeries are working for the Left or the Right. If the Left, they should not be trusted with anything ever again; if the Right, congratulations and well-played.

Now, if someone would please get the political discourse back to something that resembles current issues, please? Like I give a rat’s azz about what either of these two twits did in 1968 or 1973. Geez.

Posted By: Gary
Last Edit: 09 Sep 2004 @ 07:51 PM

EmailPermalink
Tags
Categories: News, Political


 

Responses to this post » (One Total)

 
  1. douglas roberts says:

    angela davis, a 60s radical, forged the national guard documents. angela davis is working with
    the F.A.R.C also known as the revolutionary armed forces of columbia. angela davis forged the
    documents at the school where she teaches. doug roberts 10 howard st. salem massachusetts.
    signin97@hotmail.com


 Last 50 Posts
Change Theme...
  • Users » 2
  • Posts/Pages » 5,656
  • Comments » 897
Change Theme...
  • VoidVoid « Default
  • LifeLife
  • EarthEarth
  • WindWind
  • WaterWater
  • FireFire
  • LightLight

MythTV



    No Child Pages.

Who is Bunk?



    No Child Pages.

Friends



    No Child Pages.