BunkBlog

Ya know, people often say to me, “If you make a design with such-and-such on it, I would definitely buy it and so would x other people.” And then I go to the effort to make these designs and how many people buy them? None? Maybe one, in some cases.

Why bother?

WASTE_PUBLIC_KEY 20 1536 AndySocial
E5ABD3F7957F0B37D97624758D6360324F510A7F9BAFE39E67AB1125B1C2
CA6BF268853789E068B0D0AD814C34B3704CCCAE0C06361D1513805B4659
5EBD046162ADAA589C31EC692CF2C215F9418F7DED5AD0CD9BB9310FCF46
F42FE6F9AAF9E831BEF7F1597F6CD247C5E1F0713A3A43F9598D5708FEC9
1583CF7709476ACECE276D2EC7F28B27C279A9E01D21C0A8BC76EA998B2A
B5FD0158BEE565975A515455F5E4727074E82A649EFB6EACE0F46C3164DD
24F1631187460D36DF684C9D0003010001
WASTE_PUBLIC_KEY_END

If you have to ask…

For those who don’t want to register for the NYTimes site, here’s an interesting article about how the US has graciously decided to allow our Second Amendment rights for the Iraqi populace. Still not sure about the First Amendment.
More »

From the June 2nd London Daily Telegraph

By Andrew Sparrow and Benedict Brogan
Tony Blair promised yesterday to publish new evidence showing that Saddam Hussein had weapons of mass destruction as an opinion poll found that 44 per cent of voters think he misled them about the threat.

In a further blow, Clare Short accused him of practising a triple deception before the invasion of Iraq and Robin Cook condemned the conflict as a “monumental blunder”.
More »

Does anyone know where I might find Duralex glassware? My tempered glasses from Pier One are starting to chip and shatter, which is pathetic. We had Duralex glasses when I was young, and I know they’re some sort of fixture in European homes, but where can I buy them online or in the States.

Just to remind you of the Pornolizer.

The Friday Five was less lame this week…

1. What do you want to be remembered for? Humor and joy.
2. What quotation best fits your outlook on life? If you choose not to decide, you still have made a choice.
3. What single achievement are you most proud of in the past year? The first full-system certification of a SIGINT platform for interoperability. Sad, isn’t it?
4. What about the past ten years? Toughie…The course rewrite for the 98GKP course, I guess. Nothing else jumps out at me.
5. If you were asked to give a child a single piece of advice to guide them through life, what would it be? Think hard about your decisions, and don’t look back.

Aircraft carrier for sale, “cheap.”

If I don’t get a bunch of sales on my store, Cafepress says they’ll steal my commissions! C’mon, people, help me out here!

Or not, and I’ll use the accrued commission to buy myself a t-shirt or something.

Following up my previous post wondering why CSS is harder to make behave than a table…

Anyway, I just decided to fake it by moving the archive listing to its own page, making the right-hand column incredibly shorter. Odds are, if I have even one post now it won’t get wacky on me. And if it does, maybe it’s telling me I should write more.

Update: With the assistance of the inestimable Gringo, I think maybe it’s working now. Of course, if I don’t shut up for a while, I’ll never know. 🙂

Thanks, Dave. Looks like a good fix. Damned floats…

Just to prove my geekiness, I now have Acrobat Reader on my Clie, and I’ve put the PDF version of Atlas Shrugged on it. It makes that book much more portable. Too bad I can’t take my Clie to work any more – I need something to keep me awake there.

Anyone out there with enough CSS savvy to explain why my main page looks like crap if I don’t have a lot of entries in my weblog? If the links column is longer than the content column, the links ease into the left side. I’ve tried playing with the “height:100%” style, but that only seems to work in IE6. In Netscape/Mozilla and Opera it’s broken. I’m sure the browsers aren’t broken, but why does the code not work quite right? I’m not going to use tables like 1996 to align my page content…

Help? Anyone?

Iran arrests Al Qaeda terrorists and President Bush says he’s not impressed.

Anyone surprised?

SCO says, We own Unix!
Do Not!
Do Too!

And so it goes…

In response to my musing about what Raymond and Stallman think, Eric Raymond has posted some interesting reading.

Whoever ordered from the Spoiled Brat store, thanks. I was beginning to think nobody remembered that it was there. Of course, the Che Guevara store is gone now, but I have others. Just go to my store to see the options.

I was going to post the Friday Five, but it was just too lame for words this week. Off to San Antonio this weekend.

Both Arianna Huffington and Tom Tomorrow make the correlation between the Spin Doctors of 1600 Pennsylvania and the Matrix Reloaded. Guess it’s not too much of a stretch, considering how the administration’s views on most international events seem at least slightly off from the objective reality.

Cafepress has been told I’m violating the copyrights of Albert Korda with an image of Che Guevara I was using on some products that nobody ever bought. Apparently Señor Korda’s estate is more interested in his intellectual property than he ever was. There are many concepts involved in this case, and I’ll lay them out for you.

• Korda said specifically that he wanted people to copy and spread the image of Che Guevara, as seen in this quote:
  

  I am not averse to its reproduction by those who wish to propagate his [Guevara’s] memory and the cause of social justice throughout the world,” Korda said in the autumn of 2000.

• The concept of benign neglect reigns. If someone does not attempt to defend their copyright, even in the face of many highly public uses of it, the right to defend it is hard to manage. Consider how many times you’ve seen the Che Guevara image on posters, t-shirts, etc.
• The Berne copyright convention is the means for reciprocity between countries and their varying internal copyright laws. Cuba has never signed the Berne convention, because Castro said it was a tool of the capitalists. Korda lived until his death in 2001 in Cuba, and was a proud Cuban citizen.
• The image I used was not the photograph of Che that Korda took, but a stylized rendering of that image. It is a unique work. To claim that any image of Guevara infringes on Korda’s copyright implies that Guevara’s likeness is ownable and, further, that it is owned by the estate of Señor Korda.

Of course, none of this matters, because the store has been removed and it never made money anyway. Just another example of lawyers bullying people into doing things that aren’t right, merely expedient.

You belong in Time Enough For Love. You are older than you look. Your wit and wisdom are prized by others. People throw themselves on you, begging to be with you.

Which Heinlein Book Should You Have Been A Character In?
brought to you by Quizilla